Highlight

Những điều thú vị khi dùng Trí tuệ nhân tạo của Viettel

Những người dùng Internet tại Việt Nam thường lấy “chị Google” ra để… giải trí. Khi “chị” đọc văn bản hay chỉ đường cho người tham gia gi...

Tuesday, August 21, 2018

Democratic artificial intelligence will shape future technologies: Gartner


Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a key area of research and development, and while AI and machine learning algorithms begin to influence everything from our cars to our social media news feeds, the technology will soon be available to everyone.
That is if Gartner's predictions on emerging technology trends prove to be true.
On Monday, the research agency said that democratized AI will be one of the major trends which will shape our future technologies.
The research is based on the so-called "Hype Cycle," which comprises of insights from over 2,000 technologies into 35 main areas of interest and trends, with a particular focus on innovations which could give businesses a future competitive advantage.
screen-shot-2018-08-14-at-11-25-46.jpg
Gartner
Gartner says that AI technologies will be "virtually everywhere" over the next 10 years, but it will be open to the masses rather than being purely commercial.
Cloud computing, open-source projects, and the "maker" community will mold this trend, eventually "propelling AI into everyone's hands."
AI-based Platform as a Service (PaaS) solutions, autonomous driving, mobile robots, conversational AI platforms & assistants, and deep neural nets are expected to become major enterprise technologies in the future.
"Technologies representing democratized AI populate three out of five sections on the Hype Cycle, and some of them, such as deep neural nets and virtual assistants, will reach mainstream adoption in the next two to five years," said Mike Walker, research vice president at Gartner. "Other emerging technologies of that category, such as smart robots or AI PaaS, are also moving rapidly through the Hype Cycle approaching the peak and will soon have crossed it."
In addition to democratized AI, Gartner has selected four other technology trends of note.
Compartmentalized PC systems are phasing out, only to be replaced with ecosystem-supporting alternatives, which, in turn, is expected to prompt new business models based on the blockchain, digital twin technologies, IoT platforms, and knowledge graphs.


Alongside new business models, Gartner predicts an uptick in "human-centric" technologies including 4D-printing, the Internet of Things (IoT) and connected home, edge computing AI, and self-healing systems.
It is also expected that we will begin to explore the concept of biohacking with more fervor. RFID chips are already implantable, but the research agency believes that augmentation, nutrigenomics, and experimental biological experiments will also appear during the next decade.
The final trend of note is the use of ubiquitous infrastructure.
Cloud computing, a vast ecosystem of operating systems and IoT devices, data centers, and more have changed the fabric of enterprise infrastructures -- and this has paved the way for increased adoption of new technologies including 5G, carbon nanotubes, deep neural network ASICs, neuromorphic hardware and quantum computing.
"Business and technology leaders will continue to face rapidly accelerating technology innovation that will profoundly impact the way they engage with their workforce, collaborate with their partners, and create products and services for their customers," said Walker. "CIOs and technology leaders should always be scanning the market along with assessing and piloting emerging technologies to identify new business opportunities with high impact potential and strategic relevance for their business."

Global Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture Market 2018 by Manufacturers, Countries, Type and Application, Forecast to 2023

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture Market size is being driven by the growing adoption of the robots in agriculture. Increasing consumption and rising requirement of better yield of crops are estimated to be one of the major factors that is fueling the demand of robots in agriculture. Increasing consumption motivates farmers to scale up farming operations and give rise to the requirement of automating farming operations. As the farmers are shifting more towards automation, drones and robots have become integral part of agriculture farms and are enhancing yield and improving the product quality. Since AI is the backbone of robotics, increasing adoption of robots in agriculture is estimated to drive the AI in agriculture market growth. Scope of the Report: This report studies the Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture market status and outlook of Global and major regions, from angles of players, countries, product types and end industries; this report analyzes the top players in global market, and splits the Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture market by product type and applications/end industries. United States is the largest consumption countries of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture in the world in the past few years and it will keep leader position in the next few years. United States market took up about 42.96% the global market in 2017, while Europe was about 22.67%. USA is now the key developers of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture; most companies are in USA. Others are in Europe, China and India. The global Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture market is valued at 240 million USD in 2017 and is expected to reach 790 million USD by the end of 2023, growing at a CAGR of 21.8% between 2017 and 2023. The Asia-Pacific will occupy for more market share in following years, especially in China, also fast growing India and Southeast Asia regions. North America, especially The United States, will still play an important role which cannot be ignored. Any changes from United States might affect the development trend of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Agriculture. Europe also play important roles in global market, with market size of xx million USD in 2017 and will be xx million USD in 2023, with a CAGR of xx%.

Artificial Intelligence Market worth 190.61 Billion USD by 2023- Global Forecast to 2023 by Size, Share and Growth Rate

The Global Artificial Intelligence Report includes a comprehensive analysis of the present market. The report starts with the basic Global Artificial Intelligence overview and then goes into each and every detail.


The testament on the Global Artificial Intelligence Market is an in-depth section of work and is amassed by organizing both major as well as minor research. The data integrated in the report has been taken by mentioning superior-quality whitepapers, report descriptions, press releases, and by taking responses from top industry contestants. The top sectors in the market have been emphasized. These fragments have been reachable by giving information on their present and foreseen position by the end of the forecast horizon. These facts help the forthcoming players to gauge the speculation scope within the sections and sub-sections of the Global Artificial Intelligence Market.
The artificial intelligence market is expected to grow from USD 21.46 Billion in 2018 to USD 190.61 Billion by 2025, at a CAGR of 36.62% between 2018 and 2025. Major drivers for the market are growing big data, the increasing adoption of cloud-based applications and services, and increasing demand for intelligent virtual assistants. The major restraint for the market is the limited number of AI technology experts.

2018 China’s Artificial Intelligence Report


Core View
Artificial intelligence in the broad sense refers to the effect produced by the realization of human thinking through computers. It is a description and construction of an intelligent agent that can understand the surroundings and take actions; The artificial intelligence in narrow sense includes the artificial intelligence industry (including various value systems such as technology, algorithms, and applications) and artificial intelligence technologies (using machines to help, replace, or even partially surpass human to realize functions of understanding, recognition, analysis, and decision-making).
The industrial revolution brings automation to the craft industry, and machine learning automates the machine itself; The open source environment can significantly reduce the technical threshold of artificial intelligence; Visual perception gradually realizes its commercial value, and visual cognition remains to be developed.
National policy strongly supports the artificial intelligence industry, pointing out that artificial intelligence must reach the top level in the world. But it pays less attention to the moral problems and threats caused by artificial intelligence.
In the future, there will be more room for the development of complete behavioral planning or decision-making. In addition to cutting-edge algorithms, commercial barriers depend on comprehensive construction of products, services, and markets, etc.
There will be no shortage of jobs in the future, and the technological revolution will improve the overall welfare of the society. The core values of artificial intelligence are cost reduction and human wisdom preservation.
Comparison of Investment, Financing and Patents in the Field of Artificial Intelligence in China and the U.S.
According to CB Insights data, the total amount of financing for global artificial intelligence startups reached a record high of US$15.2 billion in 2017. Chinese companies and American companies accounted for 48% and 38% respectively, ranking the first and the second, respectively. In terms of patent publications, the numbers of titles or abstracts of patent publications which contain “artificial intelligence” in China increased from 328 in 2016 to 641 in 2017. The numbers in the United States increased from 108 in 2016 to 130 in 2017. However, judging from the innovation of the publications, China still lags far behind the United States.
Proportions of the Financing Amount of American And Chinese AI Startups in 2017
48% Proportion of the financing amount of Chinese companies.
38% Proportion of the financing amount of American companies.
13% Others.
2013–2017 Number of Artificial Intelligence Patent Publications in China and the United States
Knowledge Graph
Knowledge graph technology aims to describe various entity concepts and their relationships. Usually, “entity-relation-entity” form a triplet, and each entity also has its corresponding “attribute.” Large-scale knowledge graph usually contains hundreds of millions of entities, tens of billions of attributes, and hundreds of billions of relations. They are from a large amount of structured and unstructured data mining. Based on the specialized knowledge graph and the natural language understanding technology built on it, the machine can fully utilize perform the functions of reasoning and making judgment, accurately answer questions and extend the scope of intelligence.
Autonomous Driving
According to the anthropomorphic research and development concept of autonomous driving, the principle of autopilot system has five layers, which are perception-cognition -decision making-control-enforcement. It processes and integrates the information gained through sensors, get a full understanding of the overall situation, make decisions through algorithms and then generate execution instructions by the control system. In this entire process, vehicles can exchange information with the outside world (such as road facilities, other vehicles, etc.) via V2X (Vehicle to Everything) communication, help the vehicles to acquire real time information of a larger environment and to solve four problems, namely: Where am I? What is around? How will the environment change? What can I do?”.
Public Security Sector
Computer vision, speech recognition, machine learning and many other intelligent technologies can realize identification via multiple biological characteristics such as human faces, fingerprints, irises, palm prints, finger veins, voiceprints, and gait. Among them, human face, fingerprint and iris are used in more than 80% of the global biometrics market. In the actual scenes of public security, artificial intelligence technology can be used for intelligent analysis of public security big data, realize real-time monitoring, warning, study and judgment based on the knowledge network of “people, event, places, things, and organizations”, and effectively improve the cognitive, anticipation and decision-making abilities of public security. With the technological advancement of artificial intelligence and big data, the hardware deployment of high-definition online cameras and various sensors, the gradual strengthening of public security policies such as safe cities, smart cities, and Xueliang project, as well as national strategic policies related to artificial intelligence, the intelligent applications in the public security sector will start from key regions with good conditions and will reach the whole country eventually.
Development Trends of Artificial Intelligence Industry
For potential customers in a wider range of traditional industries or offline scenarios, the practical application of artificial intelligence technology often involves the transformation of hardware equipment for specific business scenarios, software integration, as well as the deployment of local computing facilities. The research and development of actual function of algorithms and technologies should be based on deep understanding of the customers’ real business scenarios. Taking market sales as an example, the increasing market demand requires more comprehensive and timely pre-sale, sales, and after-sales services. The importance of market sales is particularly prominent when there is lack of adequate understanding of the help provided by intelligent technologies, or temporary lack of perfect scientific evaluation criteria, or there is a business scene of similar technologies. The development of artificial intelligence should not only focus on the development of cutting-edge algorithms, but also pay attention to the current commercial application and market expansion. These bring more comprehensive challenges for artificial intelligence companies which relies on high-tech talents.

An Overview of Functional Components of Artificial Intelligence Financial Decision Support System

With the development of society, the company runs in a rapidly changing and unstable economy, and the enterprise faces the difficult of recording large amounts of management and operation data. The intensification of competition and the development of e-commerce require enterprises to have more accurate, timely and critical information, more in-depth financial analysis, more effective and timely communication and higher quality decision-making. Therefore, an enterprise financial decision support System (FDSS) was born at right moment. With the development of artificial intelligence technology, the FDSS combined with artificial intelligence technology becomes a research hotspot [1] [2] . In 2005, Jiangsu Land Reclamation Group developed an advanced FDSS, which integrated the reporting standardization, intelligent decision and information network. The FDSS provided convenient and effective financial information support for making decision of enterprise. Artificial intelligence financial decision support system (AIFDSS) has been attracted many attention and applied for large enterprise groups.
Decision Support System (DSS) is a computer application system that can assist and support managers to make decisions and improve the effectiveness of decisions [3] . FDSS is a computer system formed by applying DSS design ideas and methods to financial management. FDSS is a computer system used by financial personnel to assist decision-making in financial management, financial control, financial analysis, financial forecasting and decision-making. The main decision-making problems in FDSS include [1] :
1) Structural decision making. Routine repetitive decision-making, with certain rules to follow, can make an orderly arrangement in advance to achieve the desired results and goals. It is usually possible to describe and solve problems by conventional quantitative mathematical methods.
2) Unstructured decision-making. It has never happened before, or the decision-making process structure is too complex to follow the rules, or it is especially difficult to describe and solve the decision-making problems that must be solved immediately once the key problems appear.
3) Semi-structured decision-making is a decision-making problem between structured decision-making and unstructured decision-making, which has two decision-making characteristics.
The traditional financial decision support system mainly consists of two parts: database and model library [3] . There is often little that can be done about semi-structured or unstructured problems.
Whereas, AIFDSS has a breakthrough in solving semi-structured or unstructured problems. The main difference between FDSS of artificial intelligence and the traditional FDSS structures is that the former joins knowledge-based systems and other business intelligence technologies to simulate human's peculiar thinking ability. It can not only solve the problem of conventional quantitative nature, but also can help decision-makers to recognize the decision environment, clear targets and solve the semi-structured or unstructured problems by providing background materials, helping clear the problem, modifying and perfecting the model, enumerating the possible schemes and analyzing and comparing [4] . Its features are as follows: 1) it has inference structure and can simulate the thinking process of decision makers; 2) it has learning function and increases the knowledge automatically. Therefore, it can be improved slowly with little or without intermediate maintenance; 3) solve semi-structured unstructured problems of financial decision-making more effectively; 4) it can track the solution process of the problem, prove the correctness of the financial model scheme, and enhance the credibility of the financial decision-making model scheme [5] .
Due to the wide application of AIDFSS, a lot of researches on its functional components and new technologies are emerging. In 1980, Sprague proposed a three-component theory, which includes dialogue component, data component and model component. It was the based theory of DSS and played a significant role in the subsequent development of DSS. In 1981, Bonczek proposed a three systems structure, namely the language system (LS), the problem processing system (PPS) and the knowledge system (KS). This structure has its characteristic in dealing with problem, which makes it have a better effect, and henceforth lay the foundation for intelligent decision-making system development. In the late 1980s, with the rise of artificial neural network and machine learning technology, integrated the artificial intelligence into the DSS to form traditional intelligent decision support system. With the application of expert systems technology, DSS can be used better in human’s knowledge, such as problem description knowledge, process knowledge and deductive knowledge for solving problem [6] . In addition, the development of artificial intelligence technology, expert system technology, database technology and internet/intranet technology provides powerful technical support for intelligent decision support system. Thus, some representative decision support technical tools were produced, including data warehouses [7] [8] [9] , on-line analytical processing, data mining [10] , ANN [11] , genetic algorithm and fuzzy logic [12] , which had a great influence on the evolution and development of the structure of intelligent decision support system.
The above literatures mainly focus on the design and function of one part. Few research studies all the components of the structure systematically. Therefore, in order to make up the literature gap, this paper studies the influence of each component and its sub-components on decision-making in the practical application of enterprises.
From the perspective of the logical structure, intelligent decision support system generally can be divided into three parts: database, model base and knowledge base [13] . In the 1990s, the concept of data Warehouse, which combined with the traditional Intelligent FDSS further improved the effect of the auxiliary decision-making [8] .
Intelligent decision support systems are integrated by model bases, data warehouses, OLAP technologies, data mining, expert system and interactive interfaces. The data warehouse can realize the storage and synthesis of decision topics. OLAP technologies implement multidimensional data analysis, data mining is used to mine knowledge in database and data warehouse, model base realizes the combined aid decision of multiple generalized models, and expert system uses knowledge reasoning to achieve qualitative analysis. They complement each other, rely on each other, give full play to their respective auxiliary decision-making advantages and realize more effective auxiliary decision-making.
As the data warehouse has become an indispensable part of intelligent decision support system, it has been the prerequisite for it to make higher quality decisions [8] [14] , and this paper mainly studies the requirements of AIFDSS on its components in the operation process. therefore, get rid of the business intelligence technology (OLAP and data mining), basing on the Efraim & Jay [5] proposed the basic structure of the decision support system, added data warehouse module, AIFDSS can be divided into data management subsystem, data Warehouse and model management subsystem and knowledge management subsystem of four parts, as shown in Figure 1.
Each component will be discussed in detail in the following sections.
Data management subsystem is the basis of decision analysis of AIFDSS.A system that stores relevant data for a particular situation consists of the following elements: database, database management system, data catalog and query function.
1) Database
The database collects relevant data to meet the needs and structures of the organization and can be used by more users for more purposes. Data can be raw or generalized, including documents, images, maps, sound, video, and animations, concepts and ideas. Data sources can be divided into internal data sources, external data sources and personal data sources. The storage structure of database can be roughly divided into three categories: relational database, hierarchical database and network database [15] . In fact, the backstage of most management information systems is carried out in relational databases, such as Oracle and MS.
2) Data base management system
DBMS creates, users, and updates databases. An effective database and its management can support many management activities. Typical examples are browsing records, creating and maintaining a diverse set of data relationships,
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of main structure of AIFDSS.
and generating reports. The specific functions of the database management system are shown in Table 1.
3) Data catalog
A data catalog is a directory of all the data in a database. And it is a place where the database server stores data files, including not only the files on the table, but also the data files and server options files. The main function is to answer questions about data availability and the exact meaning of data source. Liking other directories, this directory supports adding new items, deleting items, and restoring information about specific objects.
4) Query function
The main tasks of the query function are to use, process, and query data. It accepts data requests from other DSS components, determines how those requests are met, explicitly expresses detailed requests and returns the results to the requester.
In essence, data warehouse technology is an information integration technology. The data warehouse obtains the original data from multiple information sources. These raw data are stored in the internal database of the data warehouse after sorting and processing, providing users with a unified, coordinated and integrated information environment, supporting the overall decision-making process of the enterprise and in-depth and comprehensive analysis of enterprise operation and management [7] [8] [9] . To achieve this goal, a data warehouse generally consists of the following seven main components [16] :
1) Source data
Source data is provided for the data warehouse, such as operational data of various production system databases, online transaction processing system (OLTP) and external data sources, which can all be used as data sources of the data warehouse.
2) Extraction, transformation and load tools
Its function is to extract data from the data source, check and organize the data, reorganize and process the data according to the design requirements of the data warehouse, and load it into the target database of the data warehouse.
3) Data modeling tool
The modeling tool establishes an information model for the source database of the data warehouse and the target database.
4) Central repository and data mart
This part is used to store data models and metadata. Meta data describes the information of the source data and the target data itself in the data warehouse, defines the transformation process from the source data to the target data, and is used to store the reorganized and sorted data. In some very large scale decision support applications, dedicated multidimensional databases have certain advantages. A data mart is a collection of DSS applications that supports a portion or specific business requirement. The data in the data mart still has the characteristics of data warehouse, except that the data in the data mart is customized for a certain department or a specific business need [17] .
5) Target database
The target database is used to store tested, sorted, processed, and reorganized data.
6) Front-end data access and analysis tools
Front-end data access and analysis tools provide business analysts and decision makers with access to data in the target database for further in-depth analysis.
7) Data warehouse management tools
Data warehouse management tools provide management means for data warehouse operation, including security management, storage management and other aspects.
We can see that in a data warehouse, the source data comes from the existing production system. As long as the data warehouse can provide the necessary information for the decision-making and analysis process supported by the data warehouse, it may become the data source of the data warehouse. Therefore, the data warehouse needs tools to extract data from the data source. Data must be validated before it can enter the data warehouse to eliminate errors that may be hidden in the data. In order to meet the need of decision support and in-depth analysis, data should pass special processing and reorganize, after inspection, sorting, processing and reorganizing, the data will be loaded into one or more of the data warehouse database, all these works are made by data extraction and conversion tools. In order to describe the requirements for data validation, collation, processing as well as the corresponding processes and steps, there must be data modeling tools.
The model management subsystem consists of the following elements: model base, model management system, modeling language, model directory, model execution, composition and instruction processor [18] [19] .
1) Model base
The model library includes general and specialized statistical, financial, forecasting, management science, and other types of quantitative models. These models provide analytical capability for DSS. The model base has ability to invoke, run, modify, compose, and examine models. The models in the model base are divided into four types: strategic, tactical, operational, and analytical. In addition, there are model infrastructure artifacts and programs.
Model building module is a tool for data analysis, including the basic construction and program of the model, such as random number production program, curve or line fitting program, net present value rapid program and regression analysis. It can be applied not only directly as a model, but also as part of a larger model.
2) Modeling tool
When encountering semi-structured or unstructured problems, some model tools are needed, such as programming tools and language programming models, such as C++, Java, OLAP software, or spreadsheet (Excel).
3) Model base management system
The function of model base management system software is to use programming language, DSS tools or subroutines and other basic components to create models, generate new programs and reports, replace and transform models, and control model data. The specific functions are shown in Table 1.
4) Model catalog
The role of the model catalog is similar to that of the data catalog, which is the classification of all models. It includes model definition. The main function is to answer questions about the feasibility and function of the model.
5) Execution, composition and instructions
Model execution controls the actual operation of the model. Model composition includes the operation of integrating some models as needed (for example, managing the output of a model; For example, predictions are processed by another model, such as the linear programming model). The model instruction is used to accept and interpret instructions from the user interface portion and transmit them to the MBMS, model execution, or integration functions. Because in many cases, DSS systems do not know which models are used for which situations, these operations are typically assisted by knowledge system components and humans in intelligent financial DSS [20] .
The knowledge management subsystem provides professional knowledge to solve many unstructured and even semi-structured problems, which is the biggest difference between the traditional FDSS and the AIFDSS. The knowledge management subsystem can also solve problems that cannot be solved by other decision support system components before and improve their operational execution ability. Its core system is the expert system [21] [22] .
The name expert system derives from the term knowledge-based expert system. Expert systems use human knowledge acquired in computers to solve problems that usually require human expertise [6] . In every expert system, there are three main components: knowledge base, inference engine and user interface. The expert system that communicates with users may also include the following additional components: the knowledge acquisition subsystem, blackboard structure, explain subsystem, knowledge-refining system.
1) Knowledge acquisition
Knowledge acquisition is the accumulation, transfer and transformation of expertise from experts or records of knowledge sources to computer programs used to build or expand knowledge bases. Potential sources of knowledge include
Table 1. Components and Technology of AIFDSS.
human experts, textbooks, multimedia files, databases (public or private), special research reports, and information available from the web. Acquiring knowledge through experts is a very complex task. In the process of building a large system, we need a knowledge engineering or knowledge enlightening expert to communicate with one or more human experts. Typically, knowledge engineering helps experts build problem areas by interpreting and integrating the answers to human problems, proposing analogies, and constructing counterexamples to counter conceptual clarity.
2) Knowledge base
The knowledge base contains the knowledge needed to understand, explain, and solve problems. It includes two essential elements: a) Facts, such as problems and theories in the problem domain; b) Special heuristic algorithms or rules guiding knowledge to be applied in special fields to solve specific problems.
3) Inference engine
The “brain” of an expert system is an inference engine, also known as a control structure or rule interpreter. The component is essentially a computer program that provides a way to reason about information in the knowledge base and blackboard structures and draw conclusions.
4) User interface
The expert system provides a language processor for friendly problem communication between users and computers. This communication can be carried out through natural language. Due to the limitations of technology, most current systems use questions-and-answers to communicate with users. Sometimes it is supplemented by menus, spreadsheets, and graphics.
5) Blackboard
Blackboard architecture belongs to the field of working memory. It is used as a database to make a specific description of the current problem by entering data. It is also used to record the assumptions and decisions in the middle. Three types of decisions can be recorded in the blackboard structure: planning (how to solve a problem), agenda (potential action to be executed), and solution (candidate assumptions and action processes generated by the system so far).
6) Explanation subsystem
The ability to track the sources of conclusions is critical in the process of experience transfer and problem solving. The interpretation subsystem can track this responsibility and explain the behavior of the expert system through interactive questioning, asking the following questions: why does the expert system ask a question? How does a conclusion come about? Why would you reject other options? What is the plan to get the solution?
7) Knowledge-refining system
Human experts have a system of knowledge-refining system, that is, they can analyze their knowledge and its application, learn from it and improve gradually. Likewise, such assessments are necessary in computerized learning so that programs can analyze the reasons for their success or failure. This leads to a more accurate knowledge base and more efficient reasoning.
In conclusion, the functional structure of Financial Intelligence DSS can be listed in Table 1.
Due to the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology and the trend of promoting artificial intelligence in China in recent years, this paper mainly summarizes the functional structure and sub-components of enterprise financial decision support system under artificial intelligence. The main difference between AIFDSS and traditional FDSS is that the knowledge management subsystem (expert system) component is added to enable it to have some human reasoning and learning ability, so as to solve some structural or semi-structural problems. Therefore, when introducing the AIFDSS structure, this paper introduces the expert system in detail on the basis of introducing the basic construction and elaborates the relationship between them. The addition of expert system makes a qualitative leap in the auxiliary role of enterprise FDSS to the management decision maker, which can make the decision maker to solve the problem more clearly and quickly. In China, AIFDSS is still in the theoretical conceptual stage, and many technologies have not been applied and popularized. The research in this paper can provide some theoretical basis for researchers and pave the way for future practical research.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Cite this paper
Wang, Q. (2018) An Overview of Functional Components of Artificial Intelligence Financial Decision Support System. Open Journal of Social Sciences6, 115-126. doi: 10.4236/jss.2018.68009.
[1]Feng, J. (1998) Research on Enterprise Financial Management Decision Support System. China Education Informatization, 8-10+17.
[2]Pan, H.P. (2016) Application Research of Intelligent Financial Decision Support System. Fujian Computer, 32, 100-101.
[3]Gorry, G.A. and Morton, M.S.S. (1970) Management Decision Systems: A Framwork for Management Information Systems. International Journal of Energy Research, 35, 781-794.
[4]Xie, K. (2003) Research on Financial and Accounting Intelligence Systems. Financial and Accounting Journal, 2b, 59-60.
[5]Turban, E., Aronson, J.E. and Liang, T.-P. (2009) Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Machinery Industry Press, Beijing.
[6]Liao, S.H. (2005) Expert System Methodologies and Applications—A Decade Review from 1995 to 2004. Expert Systems with Applications, 28, 93-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.003
[7]Agosta, L. (2000) The Essential Guide to Data Warehousing. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River.
[8]Inmon, W.H. (2002) Building the Data Warehouse. 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York City.
[9]O'Brien, J. and Marakas, G. (2009) Management Information Systems. Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development, 5, 439-446.
[10]Albashrawi, M. (2016) Detecting Financial Fraud Using Data Mining Techniques: A Decade Review from 2004 to 2015. Journal of Data Science, 14, 553-570.
[11]Kraus, M. and Feuerriegel, S. (2017) Decision Support from Financial Disclosures with Deep Neural Networks and Transfer Learning. Decision Support Systems, 104, 38-48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.10.001
[12]Korczak, J., Hernes, M. and Bac, M. (2015) Fuzzy Logic in the Multi-Agent Financial Decision Support System. Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Łódź, 13-16 September 2015, 1367-1376.
[13]Turban, E. and Aronson, J. (2000) Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems . Tsinghua University Press, Beijing.
[14]Peng, M.G. (2002) Data Warehouse Technology and Implementation. Electronic Industry Press, Beijing.
[15]Castelli, V. and Bergman, L.D. (2002) Chapter 10, Introduction to Content-Based Image Retrieval—Overview of Key Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York City.
[16]Tang, S.W. and Pei, J. (1998) Data Warehouse Technology Seminar (3) Data Warehouse Architecture. China Financial Computer, 10-14.
[17]Yang, G., Zhang, L. and Ai, B. (2000) Data Warehouse and On-Line Analytical Processing Technology. Computer Engineering and Science, 22, 39-42.
[18]Han, J. and Kamber, M. (2006) Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. 2nd Edition, 5, 1-18.
[19]Han, J., Kamber, M. and Pei, J. (2011) Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, 5, 394-395. (In Chinese)
[20]Respício, A., Captivo, M.E. and Rodrigues, A.J. (2002) A DSS for Production Planning and Scheduling in the Paper Industry. In: Adam, F., Brezillon, P., Humphreys, P. and Pomerol, J.-C., Eds., Decision Making and Decision Support in the Internet Age, Oak Tree Press, Cork, 298-308.
[21]Nedović, L. and Devedžić, V. (2002) Expert Systems in Finance—A Cross-Section of the Field. Expert Systems with Applications, 23, 49-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00027-1
[22]Nurminen, J.K., Karonen, O. and Hätönen, K. (2003) What Makes Expert Systems Survive over 10 Years—Empirical Evaluation of Several Engineering Applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 24, 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00149-5
[23]Nemati, H.R. and Barko, C.D. (2008) Organizational Data Mining (ODM): An Introduction. In: Nemati, H. and Barko, C.D., Eds., Organizational Data Mining: Leveraging Enterprise Data Resources for Optimal Performance, IGI Global, Hershey, 1-8.
[24]Sprague, R.H. (1980) A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems; Society for Information Management and the Management Information Systems Research Center.
[25]Hand, D.J., Mannila, H. and Smyth, P. (2001) Principles of Data Mining (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning). MIT Press, Cambridge.
[26]Mining, W.I.D. (2006) Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington.
[27]Prasad, R., Ranjan, K.R. and Sinha, A.K. (2006) AMRAPALIKA: An Expert System for the Diagnosis of Pests, Diseases, and Disorders in Indian Mango. Knowledge-Based Systems, 19, 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2005.08.001

Top 6 Artificial Intelligence Unicorns In World

Artificial intelligence has now become the focus of interest in most business areas. It is because in the past few years technological applications have compounded in terms of innovations and research. What failed in the late ‘50s (the period when AI originated) has now gained traction and is used in a vast array of areas.
Tech companies and startups have now focussed on AI systems being their workhorse in tandem with their employees and have reinvented the way work is done. Additionally, AI startups are also on the rise. Since 2013, AI startups have attracted more than $15 billion in investment. Some AI startups have boomed from then on, have garnered significant investment and are on the path of being a multibillion-dollar company.
In this article, we list down the top six startups that are deemed unicorns in the AI field. This list has been presented from valuations ranked from highest to the lowest.

1. ByteDance

Valuation: $20 billion
Niche area: Content through Machine Learning
Founded in 2012 by Yiming Zhang, ByteDance is a Chinese media company headquartered in Beijing that provides content as well as content platforms to users through ML. Its AI-powered content platform Toutiao relies on social trends and delivers personalised content recommendations to users based on their individual interests. ByteDance is also the parent developer of popular AI mobile apps such as TopBuzz, News Republic, musical.ly etc.
As of 2017, it had raised around $3.1 billion from various investors around the world. In 2016, ByteDance also invested in India’s well-known e-news app Dailyhunt.

2. SenseTime

Valuation: $3 billion
Niche area: Computer vision, facial recognition software
SenseTime is an AI-company based in China, which chiefly develops computer vision and facial recognition solutions to its customers. It also has developed a DL supercomputing centre which is the largest in China. With a core focus in AI technologies such as image recognition, facial recognition, video analytics, SenseTime has major clients like Qualcomm, Huawei, Weibo amongst others.
Earlier this May, it bagged a $620 million Series C funding from leading investors like Fidelity International and Tiger Global, among others.

3. CrowdStrike

Valuation: $3 billion
Niche area: Cybersecurity through Machine learning and SaaS
CrowdStrike is a US-based cybersecurity tech company which provides endpoint protection services to companies around the globe. It was founded in 2011 by computer security experts George Kurtz and Dmitri Alperovitch, CrowdStrike integrates all its security solutions (antivirus, endpoint detection response and threat surveillance) in one platform called Falcon. On top of this, it has 27 patents in its portfolio. CrowdStrike is headquartered in San Francisco, US.
As of 2018, it has raised $200 million from venture capital firms Accel and General Atlantic.

4. Preferred Networks, Inc.

Valuation: $2 billion
Niche area: Deep learning services
Headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, Preferred Networks Inc is a tech company that provides DL solutions for three business domains i.e., transportation, manufacturing and healthcare. Established in 2014 by Toru Nishikawa and Daisuke Okanohara, Preferred Networks Inc majorly focuses on applying ML-based solutions to emerging tech like the internet of things. Apart from this, it also caters to research & development and data analytics.
In 2017, it received a ¥2 billion funding from prominent Japanese companies Mitsui & Co and Hitachi, among others.

5. Afiniti

Valuation: $1.6 billion
Niche area: Advanced analytics and AI solutions, revenue optimisation
Established in 2007, Afiniti is an AI and advanced analytics provider based in Washington DC, US. It mainly aims at deriving enterprise profitability for firms through AI. Their platform Pair betterTM uses AI to identify and analyse patterns in human behaviour to bring up better connectivity and interaction amongst customers.
Afiniti serves a variety of sectors such as financial services, retail, airlines, telecommunications, among many others. By the end of 2017, the company raised around $80 million in a Series D funding.

6. Benevolent.ai

Valuation: $1.6 billion
Niche area: Drug discovery/development and medical research through AI
Benevolent.ai is a UK-based AI company that serves the healthcare and medical community. Kenneth Mulvany, who was the CEO of Proximagen, a biotech company that developed new drugs for nerve disorders, founded Benevolent.ai in 2013. The company’s team primarily consists of AI researchers and scientists who work with drug discovery and development through AI. With its offices situated in London, New York and Cambridge, it is the largest AI company in Europe and one of the five largest AI companies in the world.
In April, it received a $115 million funding from investment company Woodford Investment Management.