Highlight

Những điều thú vị khi dùng Trí tuệ nhân tạo của Viettel

Những người dùng Internet tại Việt Nam thường lấy “chị Google” ra để… giải trí. Khi “chị” đọc văn bản hay chỉ đường cho người tham gia gi...

Friday, May 26, 2017

Artificial Intelligence: Authors and titles for recent submissions

Fri, 26 May 2017

[1]  arXiv:1705.09231 [pdfother]
Neural Attribute Machines for Program Generation
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Programming Languages (cs.PL)
[2]  arXiv:1705.09218 [pdfother]
Finding Robust Solutions to Stable Marriage
Comments: Accepted for IJCAI 2017
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[3]  arXiv:1705.09058 [pdfother]
An Empirical Analysis of Approximation Algorithms for the Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problem
Comments: 4 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[4]  arXiv:1705.09045 [pdfother]
Cross-Domain Perceptual Reward Functions
Comments: A shorter version of this paper was accepted to RLDM (this http URL)
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[5]  arXiv:1705.08997 [pdfother]
State Space Decomposition and Subgoal Creation for Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Comments: 5 pages, 6 figures; 3rd Multidisciplinary Conference on Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making (RLDM 2017), Ann Arbor, Michigan
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
[6]  arXiv:1705.08968 [pdfother]
Logic Tensor Networks for Semantic Image Interpretation
Comments: 14 pages, 2 figures, IJCAI 2017
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[7]  arXiv:1705.08961 [pdfother]
Efficient, Safe, and Probably Approximately Complete Learning of Action Models
Journal-ref: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) 2017
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[8]  arXiv:1705.08926 [pdfother]
Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradients
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
[9]  arXiv:1705.09279 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdfother]
Filtering Variational Objectives
Subjects: Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
[10]  arXiv:1705.09026 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdfpsother]
Online Edge Grafting for Efficient MRF Structure Learning
Subjects: Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
[11]  arXiv:1705.09011 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdfother]
Principled Hybrids of Generative and Discriminative Domain Adaptation
Subjects: Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[12]  arXiv:1705.08982 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdfother]
Modeling The Intensity Function Of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networks
Comments: Accepted at Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI17)
Subjects: Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
[13]  arXiv:1705.08927 (cross-list from quant-ph) [pdfother]
Compiling Quantum Circuits to Realistic Hardware Architectures using Temporal Planners
Journal-ref: related to proceedings of IJCAI 2017, and ICAPS SPARK Workshop 2017
Subjects: Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Systems and Control (cs.SY)
[14]  arXiv:1705.08804 (cross-list from cs.IR) [pdfpsother]
Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filtering
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

Thu, 25 May 2017 (showing first 11 of 14 entries)

[15]  arXiv:1705.08844 [pdfother]
How a General-Purpose Commonsense Ontology can Improve Performance of Learning-Based Image Retrieval
Comments: Accepted in IJCAI-17
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
[16]  arXiv:1705.08807 [pdfother]
When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
[17]  arXiv:1705.08690 [pdfother]
Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replay
Comments: Submitted to NIPS 2017
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Learning (cs.LG)
[18]  arXiv:1705.08520 [pdf]
An effective algorithm for hyperparameter optimization of neural networks
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
[19]  arXiv:1705.08509 [pdf]
Predictive Analytics for Enhancing Travel Time Estimation in Navigation Apps of Apple, Google, and Microsoft
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[20]  arXiv:1705.08492 [pdfother]
Uplift Modeling with Multiple Treatments and General Response Types
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
[21]  arXiv:1705.08868 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdfother]
Flow-GAN: Bridging implicit and prescribed learning in generative models
Subjects: Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
[22]  arXiv:1705.08850 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdfother]
Improved Semi-supervised Learning with GANs using Manifold Invariances
Comments: 16 pages, 7 figures
Subjects: Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
[23]  arXiv:1705.08551 (cross-list from stat.ML) [pdfother]
Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guarantees
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (cs.SY)
[24]  arXiv:1705.08508 (cross-list from cs.CY) [pdfother]
Vehicle Traffic Driven Camera Placement for Better Metropolis Security Surveillance
Comments: 10 pages, 2 figures, under review for IEEE Intelligent Systems
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
[25]  arXiv:1705.08500 (cross-list from cs.LG) [pdfother]
Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks
Subjects: Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Monitoring with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI and ML) are so over-hyped today that I usually don’t talk about them. But there are real and valid uses for these technologies in monitoring and performance management. Some companies have already been employing ML and AI with good results for a long time. VividCortex’s own adaptive fault detection uses ML, a fact we don’t generally publicize.
AI and ML aren’t magic, and I think we need a broader understanding of this. And understanding that there are a few typesof ML use cases, especially for monitoring, could be useful to a lot of people.
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
I generally think about AI and ML in terms of three high-levelresults they can produce, rather than classifying them in terms of how they achieve those results.

1. Predictive Machine Learning

Predictive machine learning is the most familiar use case in monitoring and performance management today. When used in this fashion, a data scientist creates algorithms that can learn how systems normally behave. The result is a model of normal behavior that can predict a range of outcomes for the next data point to be observed. If the next observation falls outside the bounds, it’s typically considered an anomaly. This is the basis of many types of anomaly detection.
Preetam Jinka and I wrote the book on using anomaly detection for monitoring. Although we didn’t write extensively about machine learning, machine learning is just a better way (in some cases) to do the same techniques. It isn’t a fundamentally different activity.
Who’s using machine learning to predict how our systems should behave? There’s a long list of vendors and monitoring projects. Netuitive, DataDog, Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, and many more. Anomaly detection through machine learning is par for the course these days.

2. Descriptive Machine Learning

Descriptive machine learning examines data and determines what it means, then describes that in ways that humans or other machines can use. Good examples of this are fairly widespread. Image recognition, for example, uses descriptive machine learning and AI to decide what’s in a picture and then express it in a sentence. You can look at captionbot.ai to see this in action.
What would descriptive ML and AI look like in monitoring? Imagine diagnosing a crash: “I think MySQL got OOM-killed because the InnoDB buffer pool grew larger than memory.” Are any vendors doing this today? I’m not aware of any. I think it’s a hard problem, perhaps not easier than captioning images.

3. Generative Machine Learning

Generative machine learning is descriptive in reverse. Google’s software famously performs this technique, the results of which you can see on their inceptionism gallery.
I can think of a very good use for generative machine learning: creating realistic load tests. Current best practices for evaluating system performance when we can’t observe the systems in production are to run artificial benchmarks and load tests. These clean-room, sterile tests leave a lot to be desired. Generating realistic load to test applications might be commercially useful. Even generating realistic performance data is hard and might be useful.

Artificial intelligence on Hadoop: Does it make sense?



MapR just announced QSS, a new offering that enables the training of complex deep learning algorithms. We take a look at what QSS can offer, and examine AI on the Hadoop landscape.
distributed-deep-learning-mapr.jpg
Hadoop is becoming a substrate for artificial intelligence
Getty Images/iStockphoto -- MapR
This week MapR announced a new solution called Quick Start Solution (QSS), focusing on deep learning applications. MapR touts QSS as a distributed deep learning (DL) product and services offering that enables the training of complex deep learning algorithms at scale.
Here's the idea: deep learning requires lots of data, and it is complex. If MapR's Converged Data Platform is your data backbone, then QSS gives you what you need to use your data for DL applications. It makes sense, and it is in line with MapR's strategy.
MapR is the first Hadoop vendor with an offering that is marketed as what we'd call artificial intelligence (AI) on Hadoop. But does AI on Hadoop make sense more broadly? And what are other Hadoop vendors doing there?

MAPR DOES DEEP LEARNING

No hype, just fact: Artificial intelligence in simple business terms
AI has become one of the great, meaningless buzzwords of our time. In this video, the Chief Data Scientist of Dun and Bradstreet explains AI in clear business terms.
Remember when Hadoop first came out? It was a platform with many advantages, but required its users to go the extra mile to be able to use it. That has changed. Now Hadoop is a burgeoning ecosystem, and a big part of its success is due to what we call SQL-on-Hadoop.
Hadoop has always been able to store and process lots of data for cheap. But it was not until support for accessing that data via SQL became good enough that Hadoop became a serious contender as the enterprise data backbone. SQL was, and still is, the de-facto standard for accessing data. So supporting it meant that Hadoop could be used by mostly everyone.
AI and SQL are different. It's not a backwards compatibility, commodity feature. AI is a forward-looking, trending field. But even if today AI is a differentiator for those who have it, it looks like it will soon be somewhat of a commodity as well: those who do not have will not be able to compete.
AI and SQL are also similar: If you are a Hadoop vendor, this is not really what you do. This is something others do -- you just need to make sure that it can run on your platform, where all the data is. This is what MapR is out to achieve with QSS too.
MapR leverages open source container technology (think Docker), and orchestration technology (think Kubernetes) to deploy deep learning tools (think TensorFlow) in a distributed fashion. None of this technology has to do with MapR, but the value QSS brings is in making sure everything works together seamlessly.
reference-architecture.png
The distributed deep learning MapR's QSS proposes has three layers. The bottom layer is the data layer, the middle layer is the orchestration layer, and the top layer is the application layer.
Image: MapR
Ted Dunning, MapR chief application architect, explains: "The best approach for pursuing AI/Deep learning is to deploy a scalable converged data platform that supports the latest deep learning technologies with an underlying enterprise data fabric with virtually limitless scale."
He also notes that "almost all of the machine learning software is being developed independently of Hadoop and Spark. This requires a platform like MapR that is capable of supporting both Hadoop/Spark workloads as well as traditional file system APIs."
And since that works, why don't you also use MapR-DB and MapR Streams and MapR-FS to feed your data and MapR Persistent Application Client Container (PACC) to deploy your model? Oh and we've got services for you too -- we'll help you. That is MapR's message with QSS.
Anil Gadre, MapR chief product officer, says: "DL can provide profound transformational opportunities for an organization. Our expertise...coupled with [our] unique design...form the foundation for [QSS]. QSS will enable companies to quickly take advantage of modern GPU-based architectures and set them on the right path for scaling their DL efforts."

AI ON HADOOP

So, is AI on Hadoop a thing? Unlike SQL, there is no standard for AI. There is no widely accepted and understood definition even. DL is only a part of machine learning (ML) which is only a part of AI. And even within DL, while there may be some shared concepts, there is no such thing as a common API. So QSS is DL on Hadoop, but not really AI on Hadoop.
deeplearningiconsr5png-jpg.png
There is more to AI than machine learning, and there is more to machine learning than deep learning.
Image: Nvidia
The notion of using a data and compute platform like Hadoop as the substrate for AI is a natural one. But being able to run ML or DL on Hadoop does not really make a Hadoop vendor an AI vendor too. This is a discussion we've been having with many Hadoop vendor executives over the last few months.
For Cloudera CEO Tom Reilly, "ML is very real and very active, it's here and now and it's doing great things in practice. Our customers are trying to understand AI and what lies in their journey to the future. We are helping them with ML, our platform already supports ML and will continue to add support for it. We think of our platform as the host of the data people will use for AI".
​Hortonworks founder: Ambari 2.0 is as big a deal as Hadoop 2.0
From the Atlas security project, to Ambari 2.0 and SequenceIQ, Hadoop veteran and Hortonworks co-founder Arun Murthy discusses some big-data themes of the moment.
Cloudera has been criticized for trying to pose as an AI company in its recent IPO filing. To the best of our knowledge, Cloudera does not have extensive internal expertise on AI. There is a data science team, comprised of a handful of people, and there is also the recent acquisition ofsense.io.
Sense.io has been integrated in Cloudera's stack and repurposed as Cloudera Data Science Workbench (CDSW). In a recent discussion with Sean Owen, Cloudera Data Science Director, Owen compared sense.io to IBM's DataWorks.
"By providing ready access to data, CDSW decreases time to value of AI applications delivered with our automated ML platform," notes Jeremy Achin, DataRobot CEO. This is great, but it's not really AI, is it?
For Scott Gnau, Hortonworks CTO, AI is comprised of two key components: loads of data plus packaging and algorithms to traverse the data. Hortonworks supports both, and as AI wins, Hortonworks wins as well. Gnau, however, emphasizes what he sees as Hortonworks' strengths, namely enterprise governance and security.
Gnau believes we are yet to see emerging technology in AI that we have not yet dreamt of. So Hortonworks' approach is to invest in infrastructure and to be the trusted purveyor of data, while keeping an eye on emergent killer technology and applications it can plug in from an application perspective.
Each vendor's approach has to be seen in the context of where they are now and how they see themselves evolving. AI is a new battlefield that vendors approach in line with their philosophy and goals. We will continue with an analysis of how these are manifested in AI in a subsequent post.

New genetic roots for intelligence discovered



Intelligence is one of the most investigated traits in humans and higher intelligence is associated with important economic and health-related life outcomes. Despite high heritability estimates of 45% in childhood and 80% in adulthood, only a handful of genes had previously been associated with intelligence and for most of these genes the findings were not reliable. The study, published in the journal Nature Genetics,uncovered 52 genes for intelligence, of which 40 were completely new discoveries. Most of these genes are predominantly expressed in brain tissue.
"These results are very exciting as they provide very robust associations with intelligence. The genes we detect are involved in the regulation of cell development, and are specifically important in synapse formation, axon guidance and neuronal differentiation. These findings for the first time provide clear clues towards the underlying biological mechanisms of intelligence," says Danielle Posthuma, Principal Investigator of the study.
The study also showed that the genetic influences on intelligence are highly correlated with genetic influences on educational attainment, and also, albeit less strongly, with smoking cessation, intracranial volume, head circumference in infancy, autism spectrum disorder and height. Inverse genetic correlations were reported with Alzheimer's disease, depressive symptoms, smoking history, schizophrenia, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, and waist circumference.
"These genetic correlations shed light on common biological pathways for intelligence and other traits. Seven genes for intelligence are also associated with schizophrenia; nine genes also with body mass index, and four genes were also associated with obesity. These three traits show a negative correlation with intelligence," says Suzanne Sniekers, first author of the study and postdoc in the lab of Posthuma. "So, a variant of gene with a positive effect on intelligence, has a negative effect on schizophrenia, body mass index or obesity."
Future studies will need to clarify the exact role of these genes in intelligence in order to obtain a more complete picture of how genetic differences lead to differences in intelligence. "The current genetic results explain up to 5% of the total variance in intelligence. Although this is quite a large amount of variance for a trait as intelligence, there is still a long road to go: given the high heritability of intelligence, many more genetic effects are expected to be important, and these can only be detected in even larger samples," says Danielle Posthuma.

Story Source:
Materials provided by Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Suzanne Sniekers, Sven Stringer, Kyoko Watanabe, Philip R Jansen, Jonathan R I Coleman, Eva Krapohl, Erdogan Taskesen, Anke R Hammerschlag, Aysu Okbay, Delilah Zabaneh, Najaf Amin, Gerome Breen, David Cesarini, Christopher F Chabris, William G Iacono, M Arfan Ikram, Magnus Johannesson, Philipp Koellinger, James J Lee, Patrik K E Magnusson, Matt McGue, Mike B Miller, William E R Ollier, Antony Payton, Neil Pendleton, Robert Plomin, Cornelius A Rietveld, Henning Tiemeier, Cornelia M van Duijn, Danielle Posthuma. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence.Nature Genetics, 2017; DOI: 10.1038/ng.3869

Building a better 'bot': Artificial intelligence helps human groups

Artificial intelligence doesn't have to be super-sophisticated to make a difference in people's lives, according to a new study. Even 'dumb AI' can help human groups.
Artificial intelligence doesn't have to be super-sophisticated to make a difference in people's lives, according to a new Yale University study. Even "dumb AI" can help human groups.
In a series of experiments using teams of human players and robotic AI players, the inclusion of "bots" boosted the performance of human groups and the individual players, researchers found. The study appears in the May 18 edition of the journal Nature.
"Much of the current conversation about artificial intelligence has to do with whether AI is a substitute for human beings. We believe the conversation should be about AI as a complement to human beings," said Nicholas Christakis, co-director of the Yale Institute for Network Science (YINS) and senior author of the study. Christakis is a professor of sociology, ecology & evolutionary biology, biomedical engineering, and medicine at Yale.
The study adds to a growing body of Yale research into the complex dynamics of human social networks and how those networks influence everything from economic inequality to group violence.
In this case, Christakis and first author Hirokazu Shirado conducted an experiment involving an online game that required groups of people to coordinate their actions for a collective goal. The human players also interacted with anonymous bots that were programmed with three levels of behavioral randomness -- meaning the AI bots sometimes deliberately made mistakes. In addition, sometimes the bots were placed in different parts of the social network. More than 4,000 people participated in the experiment, which used a Yale-developed software called breadboard.
"We mixed people and machines into one system, interacting on a level playing field," Shirado explained. "We wanted to ask, 'Can you program the bots in simple ways?' and does that help human performance?"
The answer to both questions is yes, the researchers said.
Not only did the inclusion of bots aid the overall performance of human players, it proved particularly beneficial when tasks became more difficult, the study found. The bots accelerated the median time for groups to solve problems by 55.6%.
Furthermore, the researchers said, the experiment showed a cascade effect of improved performance by humans in the study. People whose performance improved when working with the bots subsequently influenced other human players to raise their game.
The findings are likely to have implications for a variety of situations in which people interact with AI technology, according to Christakis and Shirado.
For instance, there may be an extended period in which human drivers share roadways with autonomous cars. Likewise, military scenarios may include more operations in which human soldiers work in tandem with AI. There also are myriad possibilities for online situations pairing humans with AI tech.
"There are many ways in which the future is going to be like this," Christakis said. "The bots can help humans to help themselves."

Story Source:
Materials provided by Yale University. Original written by Jim Shelton. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference:
  1. Hirokazu Shirado, Nicholas A. Christakis. Locally noisy autonomous agents improve global human coordination in network experimentsNature, 2017; 545 (7654): 370 DOI:10.1038/nature22332

Cite This Page:
Yale University. "Building a better 'bot': Artificial intelligence helps human groups." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 17 May 2017. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170517132558.htm>.

Why Small Business Should Be Paying Attention to Artificial Intelligence

As customers become accustomed to AI-powered solutions, they'll expect the same from their local businesses.


Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the face of business. No longer a futuristic concept, its impact is real. From tech giants like Google, Apple and Amazon to user-centric behemoths like Uber and Starbucks, everyone seems to be using AI technology to transform the customer experience (CX). But, it’s not just corporate giants that are deploying AI. Smaller organizations are following suit.
Across industries, small businesses are investigating how AI can help them drive down costs, better accommodate customers and remain competitive with their increasingly tech-driven peers. For small businesses unfamiliar with AI, the prospect of rolling it out can be daunting. But, by adopting a strategic approach, small businesses can get a head start on harnessing AI and reaping the benefits it offers.

Applying AI: Learning from Starbucks

Starbucks is one notable example of an enterprise that’s embracing artificial intelligence to optimize its CX. At the end of January, the company announced that it would offer voice ordering capabilities via Alexa, Amazon’s cloud-based virtual assistant with a continuously expanding base of skills. Linking up with Amazon, the coffee giant created a new Alexa skill specifically geared toward ordering at Starbucks. The skill -- called Starbucks Reorder -- provides users with a voice-activated way to place their typical order (“Alexa, tell Starbucks to start my usual order.”) or check their card balance.
Currently in the beta phase, Starbucks’ evolving use of Alexa points to the experimental approach companies are willing to take when it comes to deploying AI. While big business use of AI is generating the most publicity, small businesses should also consider how they can leverage the technology to meet customer needs.
As customers become accustomed to AI-powered solutions like Starbucks’ Alexa offering, they’ll expect the same from their local businesses. Here are some proactive steps small organizations can take to lay the groundwork for business-applied AI:

Give AI a try in your personal life. 

Before deciding if AI is appropriate for their companies, small business owners should put on their consumer hats and use the technologyoutside of work. Test out Amazon Alexa or Google Home to determine what you like and dislike about the devices, and how your own customers might use similar technology to interact with your business. Brainstorm ways you could potentially weave AI into your company and weigh the pros and cons of implementing emerging tech.

Lay out business-specific AI goals. 

Small businesses shouldn’t approach AI without a set plan -- it’s crucial to prioritize specific applications for artificial intelligence technology. For instance, if you run a clothing store, perhaps you’ll look into predictive analytics technology to reduce staffing inefficiencies. Alternately, if you own a restaurant, you may focus more on the potential of autonomous delivery vehicles. And if you’re a company with complicated accounting, you might look to ease the process with AI. By setting specific and highly focused goals, small businesses can more easily lay out a game plan to fulfill them.

Get your IT capabilities up to speed.

As a November 2016 study on the mounting adoption of AI pointed out, difficulty tracking and making sense of data is one of the key roadblocks enterprises face when deploying artificial intelligence. Small businesses cannot benefit from AI if they lack the IT infrastructure to support it. Therefore, smaller organizations should begin their journey toward AI by adopting a modernized approach to IT -- one that moves away from legacy on-premises solutions and toward cloud-powered resources that will be able to scale up as artificial intelligence technology is implemented.

Track the growth of AI.

Actively following the evolution of AI now will pay dividends in the long run. Even if your small business isn’t currently ready to deploy emerging AI tools, it’s important to keep a close eye on the market. That way, you’ll see when technologies emerge that may benefit your business -- and you’ll be able to track the AI moves your competitors are making so you don’t fall behind.
As the examples set by companies like Starbucks illustrate, businesses are pursuing AI to optimize operations and improve the customer experience. By actively making an effort to learn about and embrace artificial intelligence, small businesses can prepare for a future powered by AI solutions.

Monday, May 22, 2017

3 types of artificial intelligence, but only 2 are valid



For all of the visions of robots taking over the world, stealing jobs, and outpacing humans in every facet of existence, we haven’t seen many cases of AI drastically changing industries, or even our day-to-day lives, just yet. For this reason, media and AI deniers alike question whether true broad-scale AI even exists. Some go as far as to conclude that it doesn’t.
The answer is a bit more nuanced than that.
Current AI applications can be broken down into three loose categories: Transformative AIDIY (Do It Yourself) AI, and Faux AI. The latter two are the most common and therefore tend to be the measure by which all AI is judged.
The everyday AI applications we’ve seen most of so far are geared toward accessing and processing data for you, making suggestions based on that data, and sometimes even executing very narrow tasks. Alexa turning on your music, telling you what’s happening in your day, and reporting on the weather outside are good examples. Another is your iPhone predicting a phone number for a contact you don’t already have saved.
While these applications might not live up to the image of AI we have in our heads, it doesn’t mean they’re not AI. It just means they’re not all that life-changing.
The kind of AI that will “take over the world” — or at least have the most dramatic effect on how people live and work — is what I think of as Transformative AI. Transformative AI turns data into insights and insights into instructions. Then, instead of simply delivering those instructions to the user so he or she can make more informed decisions, it gets to work, autonomously carrying out an entire complex process on its own based on what it has learned and continues to learn along the way.
This type of AI isn’t yet ubiquitous. The most universally known manifestation of this is likely the self-driving car. Self-driving cars are an accessible example of what it looks like for a machine to take in constantly changing information, process it, and act on it, thereby eliminating the need for human participation at any stage.
Driving is not a fixed process that is easily automated. (If it were, AI wouldn’t be necessary.) While there is indeed a finite set of actions involved in driving, the data set the AI must process shifts every single time the passenger gets into the car based on road conditions, destination, route, oncoming and surrounding traffic, street lanes, street closures, proximity to neighboring vehicles, a pedestrian stepping out in front of the car, and so on. The AI must be able to take all of this in, make a decision about it, and act on it right then and there, just like a human driver would.
This is Transformative AI, and we know it’s real because it’s already happening.
Now imagine the implications of this technology applied elsewhere. Most people will likely experience Transformative AI through their jobs or industries before it directly affects the way they live. In business, the massive amount of big data that companies are collecting will be the “fuel” that AI uses to single-handedly power processes currently handled by entire teams, and it will do so with far greater precision and efficiency.
We’re seeing this in the marketing space, as brands like Cosabella and Dole Asia have replaced their digital account teams and agencies built on artificial intelligence platforms.
But these are still early days, and it will be a while before these types of stories are commonplace. In the meantime, we’ll mostly see different manifestations of DIY AI and Faux AI.
DIY AI is any artificial intelligence platform whose end goal is to make you, the user, more informed so that you can then do the remaining work yourself. This type of AI can take in and process large amounts of data to produce insights, but that’s the end of the line for it. Put another way, it’s practical and prescriptive but not curative.
Nevertheless, it can be extremely valuable to companies and organizations that have been relying on data scientists to make sense of their data manually. Even the most talented data scientists need far more time to process, analyze, and make recommendations from data than a machine does. A few of the many reasons for this is that humans require things like sleep, food, and weekends off. A more significant reason is that humans simply don’t have the same “processing power” that machines do.
An example of DIY AI is Salesforce’s Einstein. In an ad placed in the New York Times in early May, Salesforce described how Einstein “qualifies leads, predicts when customers are ready to buy, and helps close more deals.” In other words, the AI is reading companies’ CRM data, making sense of it, and setting up salespeople for more success than they’d have if they had to wade through the same data on their own. But the execution elements of the sales process are ultimately still DIY for the user.
It’s worth noting that DIY AI is often “bolt-on,” meaning that the AI is essentially bolted onto an existing technology. It then acts as the brain that makes a once “dumb” (or static) system “smart” (or insightful). For the sake of comparison, Transformative AI must be built from the ground up, meaning there are no parts of the technology that aren’t AI-driven.
The final category of AI we’re seeing is the one that spoils it for everyone: Faux AI. While DIY AI might seem lackluster or boring, Faux AI is pretending to be something that it’s not. As with any new technology that creates hype and intrigue, AI has inspired companies to prey on the public’s lack of understanding. Many of the companies doing this are re-positioning their predictive and automation technologies as AI, when really they are just offering rules-based applications that aren’t governed by machine learning.
Not to single out any chatbots, but there are a few culprits in that space. They look and act like AI agents, but they are not really using machine learning. They are pretenders.
Programmatic ad buying is a good example of an insight-driven, predictive technology that many people confuse with AI — and which often passes itself off as the same. Because programmatic technology has been around for over a decade, learning that it is “AI” (which it’s not) can leave people feeling like artificial intelligence isn’t so special.
The way AI will evolve and begin infiltrating our lives is two-fold.
Some of the more robust DIY AI out there is actually “Transformative AI in training.” The data being collected and processed will “train” algorithms over time so that they’re ultimately equipped with all the information they need to begin acting on that data (assuming they’ve been programmed to do so).  And technologists who are just getting started on their platforms will build them with AI from the ground up, rather than bolting “training wheels” on after the fact. The result will be active sources of Transformative AI that ultimately shape up into what we imagine AI can be — ideally, in the most positive way possible.